![]() ![]()
While the survey asks respondents if they have personally experienced racism or witnessed racism, it also asks if they have “heard” reports of racism. Some would like to restore sanctions, not loosen them. Some criticize the administration’s recent decision to cease announcing the name of honor offenders during drumming out ceremonies. Traditionalists might support “reform” of the Honor Code, but not for reasons cited by the Post. Vmi alumni postview access code#The Honor Code has come under attack from The Washington Post for, among other features, its single sanction of expulsion and its drumming-out ceremony. For example, the questionnaire asks if respondents support or oppose “reforming the Honor Court” system. Several questions lend themselves to misinterpretation that will render any responses suspect. One question opens with this phrase: “Recent measures taken by VMI leadership to address issues of race and equity…” To most Americans, “equity” means something like “fairness” or “equal treatment.” In CRT-speak, the term amounts to “equality of outcome.” The use of this vocabulary is a clear tip-off of the investigators’ ideological leanings. The survey contains a loaded term that has specific meaning to adherents of Critical Race Theory (CRT), which asserts that racism is endemic in American society. Vmi alumni postview access professional#Professional survey designers no doubt could find others. Here follow the flaws and limitations that struck me. ![]() Outsiders need to be allowed to access the data to verify the investigators’ conclusions. To maintain credibility, the report needs to release the entire survey result, including cross-tabs. Given the way the questionnaire was constructed, the investigators could well find data to support whatever conclusions it wants.īarnes & Thornburg is scheduled to issue a final report in June. After reviewing the VMI racism survey, I can see why alumni are alarmed. Having had some experience years ago as publisher of Virginia Business magazine in composing readership surveys, I know how important it is to word questions carefully. Not only are traditions surrounding the academy’s controversial Confederate heritage at stake, but so, too, are such core VMI institutions as the adversarial rat line and the single-sanction honor code.Ī copy of the questionnaire was dropped on my doorstep late one night last week, and I have been examining it closely since then. As part of its contract with the Northam administration, Barnes & Thornburg will issue recommendations to address the investigation’s findings. The stated goal is to “better understand the environment and culture of VMI as an institution.”īut many VMI alumni are wondering if the real purpose is to generate data to support a predetermined conclusion: that VMI is a hotbed of racism. Prior to this, recipients will be issued the historical archived paper transcript.As part of its “equity audit” at the Virginia Military Institute, the Barnes & Thornburg law firm is conducting a survey of VMI cadets, alumni, professors and staff to gauge perceptions of racism at the military academy. Secure electronic (.pdf) transcript processing is available for cadets/alumni who attended/graduated VMI after 2000. Virginia Military Institute reserves the right to withhold grades and transcripts for individuals with outstanding administrative or financial obligations with the Institute. $10.25 per copy – paid for by credit or debit card.Electronic or Written Authorization from the individual cadet/alum (option provided online).Name, Address, Phone Number and Email address of where you can be reached (in the event there is a problem processing your request.).Social Security Number or VMI ID number. ![]() ![]() Vmi alumni postview access full#
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |